<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Boca Raton divorce attorney - Alan R. Burton Attorney at Law]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/tags/boca-raton-divorce-attorney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Alan R. Burton Attorney at Law's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:45:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Civil and Religious Divorce for Jewish Couples in Florida]]></title>
                <link>https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/civil-religious-divorce-jewish-couples-florida/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/civil-religious-divorce-jewish-couples-florida/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan R. Burton Attorney at Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Divorce Procedure]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boca Raton divorce attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[jewish divorce]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The principle of separation of church and state affects many aspects of United States law, including family law. For example, a marriage ceremony in a church, temple, or mosque is not enough to render a couple legally married under United States law; they must also obtain a marriage license and marriage certificate from the court&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The principle of separation of church and state affects many aspects of United States law, including family law. For example, a marriage ceremony in a church, temple, or mosque is not enough to render a couple legally married under United States law; they must also obtain a marriage license and marriage certificate from the court in the state in which they reside.  (Some states will issue marriage licenses to out-of-state couples, but others have a residency requirement.)  Likewise, when it comes to</span><a href="/family-law/divorce/"> <span style="font-weight: 400">divorce</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400">, civil proceedings and religious proceedings are independent of each other. In Judaism, a marriage is officially considered dissolved when the husband issues the wife a</span><a href="http://www.kayama.org/faqs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> <span style="font-weight: 400">document called a Get</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400">, which proclaims that the parties are free to remarry.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-how-does-a-get-work-in-theory-and-in-practice"><strong>How Does a Get Work in Theory and in Practice?</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400">A Get is a short document, consisting of only 12 lines, always written in the presence of a rabbi and signed by witnesses. &nbsp;It declares that the marriage has been dissolved, and that the former spouses may enter into new marriages. Unlike a civil divorce decree, it does not contain any details about division of property or child custody.</span></p>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400">According to Jewish law, a woman cannot enter a new valid marriage until her previous marriage has been dissolved by the issuance of a Get. If she has children with her new husband, they are not automatically acknowledged as members of the Jewish community and would need to go through a conversion process in order to marry within the faith.</span></p>



<!--more-->



<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The husband and wife need not both be physically present when the Get is drafted in order for it to be valid. Especially if they are estranged because of domestic abuse, one or both can send a representative to act on his or her behalf at the signing of the Get.</span></p>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Florida courts do not require Jewish couples to obtain a Get at any point in civil divorce proceedings, just as they do not require Catholic couples to have the Church annul their marriages. Religious requirements rarely play a role in Florida family law cases.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Denomination Matters</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400">A Get cannot take the place of a civil divorce, but how much civil divorce affects religious divorce varies from one denomination of Judaism to another. In Orthodox Judaism, the Get is, for all practical purposes, the only way to end a marriage. Even if an Orthodox Jewish couple gets a civil divorce, remarriage within the faith is not possible until a Get is issued. Several years ago, an Orthodox Jewish couple in New York,</span><a href="http://www.redeemrivky.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> <span style="font-weight: 400">Yoel Weiss and Rivky Stein</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400">, were the subject of media attention when he refused to grant her a Get.</span></p>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400">In Conservative Judaism, divorced couples still often end their marriages with a Get, but it is much easier to end the marriage without a Get than it is in Orthodox Judaism. If the husband refuses to grant his wife a Get, the Beit Din (rabbinical court) can annul the marriage, and the wife will be able to enter into a new Jewish marriage. Reform Judaism does not require a Get; it considers a civil divorce sufficient to end the marriage.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contact Alan Burton About Divorce in Florida</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Alan Burton is a family law attorney whose goal is to make divorce as painless as possible for couples who are going through it. </span><a href="/contact-us/"><span style="font-weight: 400">Contact Alan R. Burton</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400"> in Boca Raton, Florida for a consultation about your divorce case.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Florida Family Law Financial Affidavit]]></title>
                <link>https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/frequently-asked-questions-regarding-florida-family-law-financial-affidavit/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/frequently-asked-questions-regarding-florida-family-law-financial-affidavit/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan R. Burton Attorney at Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 11:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Divorce Procedure]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Equitable Distribution]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Financial affidavits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Marital assets]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boca Raton divorce attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[division of property]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Litigation, in which parties argue their cases before a judge, is only a small part of what happens in Florida’s family law courts. Courts deal with agreements as much as, or more than, they do with disagreements. One might not think of the words “agreement” and “divorce” as belonging together in the same sentence, but&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Litigation, in which parties argue their cases before a judge, is only a small part of what happens in Florida’s family law courts. Courts deal with agreements as much as, or more than, they do with disagreements. One might not think of the words “agreement” and “divorce” as belonging together in the same sentence, but many aspects of divorce in Florida today resemble contractual agreements more than they resemble a situation in which one party wins and the other loses. For example, a</span><a href="http://www.flcourts.org/core/fileparse.php/293/urlt/995a.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">parenting plan</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> is a detailed custody agreement in which parents agree on parenting decisions, large and small, from which parent has the final say about non-emergency medical treatment for the children to decisions about drop-off and pick-up from one parent to another.  Another detailed document used in Florida family law courts is the</span><a href="http://www.jud6.org/generalpublic/RepresentingYourself/ApprovedForms/902c.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">financial affidavit</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, which is used to determine</span><a href="/family-law/divorce/property-division/equitable-distribution/"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">division of property</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, rather than details of child custody. Here are some frequently asked questions about the family law financial affidavit in Florida.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-q-what-is-a-financial-affidavit-and-how-is-it-used"><strong>Q: What is a Financial Affidavit, and How is it Used?</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A: A financial affidavit looks a lot like an itemized tax return. It is a document on which couples in the process of divorce list their income sources and expenses, and where they classify their assets and liabilities as marital or non-marital property. The purpose of the document is to determine equitable distribution of property, including</span><a href="http://www.divorcenet.com/resources/remarriage-and-alimony-florida.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">spousal support</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> payments, if any.  Couples with and without children must file a financial affidavit.</span></p>



<!--more-->



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Q: What is the Difference Between the Long Form Affidavit and the Short Form Affidavit?</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A: As their names suggest, the difference between the two affidavits is the length and level of detail. The long form affidavit is a multi-page document with much more detail. All divorces require a family law financial affidavit. If at least one spouse has an individual annual gross income of at least $50,000, the couple must file the long form affidavit.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Q: When Should You File the Financial Affidavit?</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A: Ideally, you should file the affidavit of support with your petition for divorce. You must get the document notarized before you file it with the court. You must deliver a copy of the complete affidavit to your spouse within 45 days of filing for divorce.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Q: How Does Domestic Violence Affect the Financial Affidavit?</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A: Even if there is domestic violence involved in a divorce case, the parties must still file a financial affidavit. &nbsp;The difference is that, if you have a protective order against your spouse because of domestic violence, you are not required to list your address on the financial affidavit. &nbsp;If this is the case, you must file a Petitioner’s Request for Confidential Filing of Address. In other words, you must disclose your address to the court, but not to your spouse.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contact Alan Burton About Division of Property</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Even in relatively uncomplicated divorce cases, it still helps to get a professional legal opinion. </span><a href="/contact-us/"><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Contact Alan R. Burton</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> in Boca Raton, Florida for advice about your family law financial affidavit.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[When Is a Divorce Not a Divorce? The Zelman Case Raises Many Complicated Issues]]></title>
                <link>https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/divorce-not-divorce-zelman-case-raises-many-complicated-issues/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/divorce-not-divorce-zelman-case-raises-many-complicated-issues/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan R. Burton Attorney at Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Divorce Procedure]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boca Raton divorce attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boca Raton family lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>There is never a good time to divorce, when everything will be simple, but some issues, such as those related to division of property, seem even more complicated when the parties are elderly.  Perhaps Florida’s most notable case is that of Burt and Lovey Handelsman, who started divorce proceedings after 67 years of marriage and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">There is never a good time to divorce, when everything will be simple, but some issues, such as those related to</span><a href="http://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/crime--law/palm-beach-divorce-end-year-marriage-shakes-worth-ave-empire/eZmqTUrGpvtTs8uwwmznLJ/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">division of property</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, seem even more complicated when the parties are elderly.  Perhaps Florida’s most notable case is that of</span><a href="http://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/crime--law/palm-beach-divorce-end-year-marriage-shakes-worth-ave-empire/eZmqTUrGpvtTs8uwwmznLJ/"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Burt and Lovey Handelsman</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, who started divorce proceedings after 67 years of marriage and after amassing a fortune through ownership of commercial real estate properties throughout South Florida. Although it does not involve the same huge sums of money as the Handelsman case,</span><a href="http://www.4dca.org/opinions/Sept.%202015/9-02-15/4D14-1851.op.pdf"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Zelman v. Zelman</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> might be an even messier case, because one of the parties is suffering from dementia.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-details-of-the-zelman-case"><strong>Details of the Zelman Case</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In 2014, Martin Zelman was in his 80s and suffering from dementia and short-term memory loss. &nbsp;His son Robert Zelman petitioned the court to appoint him or one of his sisters (Martin’s daughters) as their father’s guardian. The petition also mentioned Lois Zelman, Martin’s wife to whom he had been married since 1993, among Martin’s “next of kin,” but it did not recommend her as a guardian and implied that she was an unsuitable choice to act as such. The court appointed Robert as Martin’s temporary guardian, in charge of his health and financial affairs. &nbsp;As soon as the court appointed Robert as Martin’s guardian, Robert, acting on Martin’s behalf, filed a motion with the court to have Lois removed from the marital home, claiming that she had been abusing and neglecting Martin in his vulnerable state of health. In response, Lois provided the court with evidence that she and Martin were happily married and that she had remained true to her vow to care for him in sickness and in health. The court ruled that Lois must leave the couple’s apartment, and she complied, moving into another apartment in the same building.</span></p>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lois argued that Martin was not sufficiently incapacitated as to require a guardian; she proposed instead that the court appoint a power of attorney and health surrogate for him and that he receive in-home health assistance around the clock. Many other petitions followed, filed by Lois and by Robert, disagreeing over details of the extent of Martin’s incapacity and over whom, if anyone, the court should appoint as his guardian. An attorney representing Lois alleged that Martin’s children were trying to force Martin to divorce Lois. The court ruled that, even if the court dissolved the marriage, such a dissolution would not count as a divorce, and that Lois would be entitled to the same assets from Martin’s estate, upon his death, as if they had still been married.</span></p>



<!--more-->



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Appeals Court’s Decision</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The appeals court eventually ruled that the previous decisions of the lower courts were so convoluted that the only way to resolve the matter was to re-try the case from the beginning. For example, the court ruled that Martin was not competent to marry but was competent to file a lawsuit, which does not make sense. The issue of whether Lois was actually a “party” in any of the lawsuits or merely an “interested person” was also a hopelessly confusing issue.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contact Alan Burton About Late-in-Life Divorce Cases</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Cases like </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Zelman v. Zelman</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;">, when one of the parties is in poor health because of old age, make divorce even more complicated. </span><a href="/contact-us/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Contact Alan R. Burton</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> in Boca Raton, Florida for a consultation relating to your elderly relative’s legal decisions.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[What the Hua vs. Tsung Case Teaches Us About High Asset Divorce in Florida]]></title>
                <link>https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/hua-vs-tsung-case-teaches-us-high-asset-divorce-florida/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/hua-vs-tsung-case-teaches-us-high-asset-divorce-florida/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan R. Burton Attorney at Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 13:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[permanent alimony]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[alimony]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boca Raton divorce attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[spousal maintenance]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[spousal support]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Florida is one of only a few states in which judges can award permanent alimony to the spouse with the lower income or earning potential as part of a divorce decree. For a novelist with a certain mindset, Florida’s spousal support laws could be a plot point in a farce about materialistic social climbers and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Florida is one of only a few states in which judges can award</span><a href="http://www.divorcenet.com/resources/divorce/spousal-support/understanding-and-calculating-alimony-fl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">permanent alimony</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> to the spouse with the lower income or earning potential as part of a</span><a href="/family-law/divorce/"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">divorce</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> decree. For a novelist with a certain mindset, Florida’s spousal support laws could be a plot point in a farce about materialistic social climbers and wealthy business tycoons. (Would Bunny Lebowski in </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Big Lebowski</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> have had to stage her own abduction if she could have just sued for permanent alimony?) In practice, permanent alimony is one of the least frequently awarded forms of spousal support.  The only people who are even eligible to receive permanent spousal support are those who have been married for 17 years or more. Most permanent alimony recipients are elderly or have a chronic illness that would make gainful employment difficult or impossible.</span></p>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Local media have recently highlighted the complexities of high asset divorce by reporting on the divorce of Nancy Hua and Dennis Tsung, an affluent South Florida couple. As of August 2017, the details of how to divide the couple’s assets have yet to be completely worked out. The rulings issued so far in the divorce and in</span><a href="http://law.justia.com/cases/florida/fourth-district-court-of-appeal/2017/15-4213.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Nancy Hua’s appeal</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> reveal many interesting things about the way Florida courts view property division between divorced spouses.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-wealth-plus-time-does-not-always-equal-permanent-alimony"><strong>Wealth Plus Time Does Not Always Equal Permanent Alimony</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nancy and Dennis were married for almost 18 years. In the original divorce case, Nancy requested permanent alimony of $20,000 per month. For most of the marriage she had been a stay-at-home parent with no income. The spousal support award she received was for rehabilitative alimony; Dennis was to pay her $2,500 per month for two years. He was also to pay $12,000 toward her educational expenses; the plan was for her to attend nursing school and then begin working. The court estimated that she would be able to earn an annual income of $50,000 working full time as a nurse. The reason for the court’s decision to award rehabilitative alimony is that Nancy Hua had plenty of potential for gainful employment. She was in her early forties and in good health, and her children were old enough not to require full time childcare.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Counts as Marital Property?</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Another point of contention in the divorce was some valuable shares that Dennis Tsung owned in a Chinese company. He argued, though, that the shares should not be considered marital property because it was his father who had bought the shares in Dennis’ name. Nancy, Dennis, and the elder Mr. Tsung agreed that Dennis was legally registered as the owner of the shares. The reason for registering the shares in Dennis Tsung’s name was so that, upon his father’s death, he would not have to pay a 40% tax to inherit them, as Chinese law would require. A footnote in the appeal that, in an attempt to avoid paying 40% of the value of the shares in taxes, Dennis left himself open to the possibility of being ordered to pay 50% of their value in spousal support to his ex-wife. The court ruled that because the shares legally belong to Dennis, they are, in fact, marital property.</span></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>High Asset Divorce with Alan Burton Law</strong></h2>



<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Alan R. Burton practices family law in Palm Beach County, Florida. </span><a href="/contact-us/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Contact Alan Burton</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> to </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">find out how he can help with property division in your high asset divorce.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Divorcing Spouses Should Stay Off Social Networking Sites]]></title>
                <link>https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/divorcing-spouses-stay-social-networking-sites/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/divorcing-spouses-stay-social-networking-sites/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan R. Burton Attorney at Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boca Raton divorce attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boca Raton divorce lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In previous decades, divorcing spouses may have hired private detectives or other surveillance to catch their spouses in lies or questionable behavior. In recent years, however, such resources have become almost unnecessary since many Americans tend to broadcast nearly every detail of their lives online. Social networking sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Tumblr, Twitter, and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In previous decades, divorcing spouses may have hired private detectives or other surveillance to catch their spouses in lies or questionable behavior. In recent years, however, such resources have become almost unnecessary since many Americans tend to broadcast nearly every detail of their lives online. Social networking sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Tumblr, Twitter, and more allow people to post statuses and photos that allow a look into their daily activities. Such posts can make it very easy for divorcing spouses to catch each other in lies or combat arguments made to the court.</p>



<p>No matter how often divorce attorneys warn clients to stay off social media, we are constantly surprised by how many people ignore this basic advice. Some clients believe their online activities are okay because they “defriended” or “blocked” their spouse. However, you likely still have some online contacts in common with your spouse, and those “friends” may always report information back to your spouse. Information online is widely discoverable, so it is always the best idea to stay off these sites or even suspend your profile until after your divorce is final. The following are some issues that social media posts may adversely affect in your divorce.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-spousal-support-and-property-division"><strong>Spousal Support and Property Division</strong></h2>



<p>If your spouse has significantly greater earning capacity than you, you may likely want to seek a greater portion of the marital assets and property or spousal support. However, social media posts may belie your claims of financial hardship and need for support. Photos of you on vacation, at concerts, or even a simple “check-in” at an expensive restaurant may give your spouse ammunition to fight against any spousal support orders.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-child-custody"><strong>Child Custody</strong></h2>



<p>If you and your spouse are arguing about any custody or time-sharing issues, you never want to risk looking like an unfit parent. For example, if you post any status updates or pictures that may indicate you are participating in excessive use of alcohol, drugs, or other partying activities, your spouse may use those to try to demonstrate that you are not acting in the best interests of your children.</p>



<p>Additionally, even if you do not post your own photos, there is always the chance that a friend will tag you in a post or photo. Even associating with questionable people can cast doubt on your reputation and your ability to act as a fit parent and role model.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-the-ability-to-negotiate-with-your-spouse"><strong>The Ability to Negotiate with Your Spouse</strong></h2>



<p>It is often very tempting to air dirty laundry on social media sites. When emotions are running high, people may post negative messages regarding their estranged or separated spouse. This may cause tensions to rise and can make your spouse less likely to want to work together to come to agreements in divorce. Such acrimonious relationships often lead to litigation and lengthy battles to decide even the smallest of issues in a divorce.</p>



<p>In short, it is always best to stay off social media sites during a divorce and never risk that something you post may be taken the wrong way. If you are considering divorce, experienced Boca Raton divorce attorney <a href="https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alan R. Burton</a> can assist you with every aspect of your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Can a Court Force Us to Sell Our Home in a Divorce?]]></title>
                <link>https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/can-court-force-us-sell-home-divorce/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/blog/can-court-force-us-sell-home-divorce/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan R. Burton Attorney at Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:34:27 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Marital home]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boca Raton divorce attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boca Raton divorce lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>When most people think of divorcing couples who own homes, they may likely think of the question: who will get the house? This question usually implies that one spouse or the other will remain in the family home, while the other spouse must find a new residence. However, there is another option that many spouses&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>When most people think of divorcing couples who own homes, they may likely think of the question: who will get the house? This question usually implies that one spouse or the other will remain in the family home, while the other spouse must find a new residence. However, there is another option that many spouses do not consider—that neither spouse will get the house.</p>



<p>If a couple cannot reach an agreement regarding who may stay in the home, the issue will have to be litigated in court. The court will look for a way to most equitably divide the property in accordance with <a href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0061/0061PARTIContentsIndex.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2011/Chapter61/PART_I/http:/www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0061/Sections/0061.075.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Florida divorce law</a>. Often, this may require the couple to sell the family home at fair market value, pay off the mortgage, and then divide the net proceeds equitably, if there are any.</p>



<p>Note that <a href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0061/Sections/0061.075.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">equitable distribution of property</a> is not always 50/50 as the court considers many factors when deciding how to fairly divide property. For example, if one spouse had an affair, gambling problem, shopping addiction, or other factor that caused them to waste marital funds, the court may award that spouse significantly less proceeds for the home sale.</p>



<p>Selling the home may not always be preferable for divorcing spouses, especially if there are children who do not wish to be uprooted or if there will not be enough net proceeds for future down payments on separate properties. While a court will examine all of these circumstances, there is always a chance that the judge will order the sale of the family house in a Florida divorce even if it is against the wishes of the spouses.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-the-importance-of-working-towards-agreements-in-divorce"><strong>The Importance of Working Towards Agreements in Divorce</strong></h2>



<p>Divorce can be complicated, especially if you and your spouse own a home or other substantial property. If you cannot agree on certain matters, such as who will remain living in the house, you risk leaving those decisions up to the divorce court. The decision by the court may not be the solution either of you preferred, so it is always better to negotiate and work together to agree on important matters. Working together may be difficult if your relationship has deteriorated beyond a certain point, and in such situations, an experienced divorce attorney can work to negotiate on your behalf.</p>



<p>An attorney will not let emotions cloud his judgment during the divorce process and is therefore able to focus on what is best for you. Spouses who have qualified attorneys often have a better chance of coming to agreements and avoiding litigation. This is usually preferable as litigation can be costly, time-consuming, stressful, and will often end up in a less desirable result—such as selling the home and dividing the profits.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-contact-an-experienced-boca-raton-divorce-attorney-for-assistance"><strong>Contact an Experienced Boca Raton Divorce Attorney for Assistance</strong></h2>



<p><a href="https://www.alanburtonlaw.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alan R. Burton</a> is a highly experienced divorce attorney who has many resources to try to keep divorcing spouses out of court and come to agreements on their own. If you are facing divorce, contact our office today for help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>